Volume 2, Issue 3 (12-2019)
Iran J Health Insur 2019, 2(3): 106-116 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Akhavan Behbahani A, Masoudi Asl I, Hessam S, Najafikhah M. بررسی تطبیقی کمیسیونهای قانون گذاری مجالس در بخش سلامت در کشورهای منتخب و ایران. Iran J Health Insur 2019; 2 (3) :106-116
URL: http://journal.ihio.gov.ir/article-1-112-en.html
URL: http://journal.ihio.gov.ir/article-1-112-en.html
1- Department of Health Services Management, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2- Department of Health, Islamic Parliament Research Center of The I.R.I, Tehran, Iran ,masoudi_1352@yahoo.com
3- National Center of Health law Research, Ministry of Health and Medical Education, Tehran, Iran
2- Department of Health, Islamic Parliament Research Center of The I.R.I, Tehran, Iran ,
3- National Center of Health law Research, Ministry of Health and Medical Education, Tehran, Iran
Abstract: (4312 Views)
Introduction: Parliaments are the embodiment of democratic political systems. Each legislative assembly is a complex organization usually with several hundred members. The two main tools for organizing legislative assemblies are political parties and internal parliamentary committees. On the other hand, governments' involvement and interference in health is often achieved through legislation. Legislation in a complex, highly specialized, sensitive and challenging environment such as health requires a great deal of care and attention. Therefore, the role of committees in organizing health approvals is crucial.
Methods: This research is a comparative study. The research environment consists of legislative assemblies in ten selected countries that were selected and evaluated by 4 criteria of legal system, executive regime, efficiency and success in legislation and type of health system through targeted search. The level of duties and responsibilities of the commissions varied across the countries studied.
Results: The legislatures of the studied countries use different models with different levels of authority to legislate in the health sector. There were various active legislative commissions in all 10 countries studied. In 6 countries (Japan, Turkey, South Africa, USA, Egypt and Iran) there was an Commission on Health Affairs and in 4 other countries such commission were not seen.
Conclusion: In the Iranian Parliament, the Independent Commission on Health Care is considered to have a wide range of functions and responsibilities and can easily interact with stakeholder's.Provides expert and specialized work in the field of health that should be considered.
Methods: This research is a comparative study. The research environment consists of legislative assemblies in ten selected countries that were selected and evaluated by 4 criteria of legal system, executive regime, efficiency and success in legislation and type of health system through targeted search. The level of duties and responsibilities of the commissions varied across the countries studied.
Results: The legislatures of the studied countries use different models with different levels of authority to legislate in the health sector. There were various active legislative commissions in all 10 countries studied. In 6 countries (Japan, Turkey, South Africa, USA, Egypt and Iran) there was an Commission on Health Affairs and in 4 other countries such commission were not seen.
Conclusion: In the Iranian Parliament, the Independent Commission on Health Care is considered to have a wide range of functions and responsibilities and can easily interact with stakeholder's.Provides expert and specialized work in the field of health that should be considered.
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
Special
Received: 2019/11/30 | Revised: 2020/10/5 | Accepted: 2019/12/7 | ePublished: 2019/12/10
Received: 2019/11/30 | Revised: 2020/10/5 | Accepted: 2019/12/7 | ePublished: 2019/12/10
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
